pipeline/outputs/influxdb.md (1)

154-164: Consider clarifying the input configuration in the example.

All four inputs use name: cpu even though the tags suggest different hardware types (gpu). While this is technically valid and simplifies the example to focus on routing and prefix stripping, it might be slightly confusing. Consider adding a brief comment explaining that the same input plugin is used with different tags for demonstration purposes, or acknowledging that in a real scenario, gpu tags might come from different sources.

💡 Optional clarification

You could add a comment above the inputs section like:

 ```yaml
 pipeline:
   inputs:
+    # Using cpu plugin with different tags to demonstrate routing and prefix stripping
     - name: cpu
       tag: cpu.one

Or in prose before the example:

-When collecting data from many inputs into many buckets, it can be helpful to remove a common prefix using `Strip_prefix`.
+When collecting data from many inputs into many buckets, it can be helpful to remove a common prefix using `Strip_prefix`. The following example uses the same input plugin with different tags to demonstrate how prefix stripping works with pattern-based routing.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@pipeline/outputs/influxdb.md` around lines 154 - 164, The example under
pipeline.inputs uses name: cpu for all four entries which can confuse readers
because tags include gpu; update the example to either (a) add a brief inline
comment above the inputs (referencing pipeline.inputs and the name: cpu entries)
explaining that the cpu plugin is intentionally reused with different tags for
demonstration of routing/prefix stripping, or (b) change the relevant entries to
use a more representative name (e.g., name: gpu) for gpu.* tags so tag names and
input plugin names align; ensure the comment or rename clearly references the
tag values (cpu.one, cpu.two, gpu.one, gpu.two) so readers understand the
intent.

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes